Do those words sound familiar? They should, because they are the foundation of every sworn oath in most federal and state oaths of office. We hear them solemnly delivered every four years as the next President of the United States is sworn in. To be specific, we hear the newly elected or re-elected president say this: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
U.S. Senators and Representatives have a slightly easier burden to bear, needing to only to ‘support and defend’ the Constitution – “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.” Justices seated on the Supreme Court bench must take the same oath.
Our military have the highest standard with their oath which mirrors much of Congress members’ oaths, but adds obeying the orders of the President and officers appointed over them. What makes the military oath unique however is the Uniform Code of Military Justice which can be used to impose severe penalties for breaking the oath. Academically speaking, Federal and state offices also have mechanisms for oath breakers, but when the fox is allowed to bunk in the henhouse who will hold oath breakers accountable? Only you.
The oath of office is a solemn vow, not to be taken lightly. Nor does it apply to only the parts of the Constitution you agree with. It applies, steadfastly, to the entire shooting match. Soup to nuts, the full boat, six ways to Sunday. Insert your favorite euphemism here…it is all the same. An oath is an oath, period.
The second amendment to the United States Constitution clearly denotes that it “shall not be infringed”. I don’t know about you, but I see a whole lot of infringing going on. Can you imagine the uproar across the country if elected federal officials decreed that only some forms of media are protected under the first amendment? And that we, for the public welfare, need to enact some ‘common sense’ free speech laws? What if you are told we need to get ‘assault media’ off of our television screens? Those would be the outlets that don’t toe the line – all for the greater good of course.
We cannot, as a free society governed as republic of laws, not men, be so willing to abdicate our responsibilities as citizens to hold those who would shred our very identity as Americans, the United States Constitution, to pieces without consequences. If you think I may be preaching to the proverbial choir, please let me explain. I wanted to speak those on the fence about the gun control efforts snowballing in Washington. I’m trying to reach those that may not own a gun, do not hunt, or may feel that they don’t have a dog in this fight – the folks who are understandably concerned about violence in the county, but may not be informed on the issues. Because you see, if they can take away my rights to own a gun, they can take away any rights guaranteed under the Constitution – free speech, the right to vote, women and minority protections, the right to petition the government…should I keep going?
